Rebecca Lane

Rebecca Lane has an impeccable reputation in real estate and a passion for dogs!  Rebecca Lane is currently serving California's Central Valley, including but not limited to Stanislaus County, San Joaquin County, Oakdale, Modesto, Riverbank, Escalon and Lodi.  Regardless of your personal real estate needs I can help you today.

Housing Trends: New Rules Could Revive Recovery

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that purchase mortgages from lenders and package them into securities that are sold to investors. The two companies currently back about 60% of all U.S. mortgages, and their infrastructure has made the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage widely available to U.S. borrowers.1–2

Before the housing crisis, Freddie and Fannie were profitable but held little capital in reserve.3 Rising loan defaults led to major losses, and the federal government rescued the failing GSEs with a $187.5 billion bailout in 2008.4 All bailout funds have been repaid, but both firms operate under a government conservatorship that will last until Congress or their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), acts to end it.5

In recent weeks, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen have expressed concerns that tight credit is holding back home sales, and slowing markets could pose a potential threat to the U.S. economy.6

Congress has been debating the future of Fannie, Freddie, and government involvement in the housing market. Meanwhile, new FHFA Director Mel Watt has decided that the mortgage giants should focus on making more credit available to homebuyers instead of pulling back from the mortgage market.7

Policy Switch
In his first public speech, Director Watt announced a new set of guidelines intended to expand access to credit and support the housing sector.

  • Watt said the agency will not change the current loan limits for “conforming” mortgages that can be purchased by Fannie and Freddie ($417,000 in most places and up to $625,500 in high-cost areas). Previously, the FHFA was considering a plan to lower the maximum loan amounts, a move that could undercut ­recovering housing markets.8

  • The FHFA will relax the terms for when GSEs can demand that sellers repurchase a faulty loan. Some lenders have paid billions to buy back and settle suits over bad loans and may have adopted stricter lending standards in fear of potential “putbacks.” The expectation is that lenders will loosen underwriting standards and be willing to approve more mortgages.9

Reform Efforts Stall
Bipartisan legislation seeking to overhaul the nation’s mortgage finance system, reduce the federal government’s role in the housing market, and protect taxpayers from future bailouts recently cleared the Senate Banking Committee. The Johnson-Crapo bill would eliminate Fannie and Freddie, and private institutions would take over the securitization and insurance functions. Government reinsurance on the securities would kick in only after private capital is wiped out.10

The bill hasn’t won broad enough support to be taken up by the full Senate. Some lawmakers think that Fannie and Freddie should be restructured rather than dismantled. Opponents believe the plan gives lenders too much control over the credit market; some are worried about higher borrowing costs that could shut some buyers out of the market.11  

Housing Challenges Remain
The housing recovery is still fragile, and markets have shown signs of weakness in recent months.

March home sales were fairly soft, falling 0.2% year over year.12 On top of tight credit, rising mortgage rates, higher prices, and a harsh winter are thought to have stifled sales, though it appears that affluent buyers have fared better than entry-level buyers under these conditions.13

In fact, many younger households with stable incomes may have been sidelined by strict underwriting standards or because they were carrying student debt that affects their ability and willingness to take out a mortgage.14 

Some homeowners who would like to move may be waiting because they owe more than their homes are worth, or because selling wouldn’t free up enough equity for a down payment on another home. At the end of the first quarter of 2014, about 18.8% of U.S. households (9.7 million) with mortgages were underwater, and another 10 million had equity of 20% or less.15

The $10 trillion U.S. mortgage market is a complex and critical part of the nation’s economy, yet it’s still unclear whether reform efforts will bring about a different and/or stronger mortgage finance system for the future. Even so, short-term policy changes that seem minor in comparison could still affect many potential homebuyers and sellers.16  

1, 4) Reuters, May 13, 2014
2–3, 5, 10–11, 16) The Wall Street Journal, May 15, 2014
6–8) The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2014
9) MarketWatch, May 14, 2014
12) National Association of Realtors, April 22, 2014
13) MarketWatch, April 9, 2014
14) MarketWatch, May 15, 2014
15) The Wall Street Journal, May 20, 2014

The information in this article is not intended as tax or legal advice, and it may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. You are encouraged to seek tax or legal advice from an independent professional advisor. The content is derived from sources believed to be accurate. Neither the information presented nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. This material was written and prepared by Emerald. Copyright 2014 Emerald Connect, LLC.

Common Myths About Appraisals in the Home Buying Process

At The Appraisal Foundation, we often encounter misperceptions about the role of appraisals in the home buying process. From first time homebuyers to seasoned real estate professionals, there is often confusion about the purpose of an appraisal, how it is ordered and carried out, and what type of communication is allowed with appraisers. Dispelling these misunderstandings is critical to educating borrowers, lenders, real estate brokers, and homebuilders on the central role of appraisals in the mortgage process. That's why we decided to compile the most common myths that we hear from these different groups – and set the record straight.

Read More

The Plight of First-Time Buyers

It’s not a $64,000 question, but rather a $41,000 one. “Where are the first-time buyers?” It’s important because $41,000 is the amount renters have missed out on by not buying three years ago when prices were at a low point. The annual median home price was $166,100 in 2011 and $197,100 in 2013. The median national home price this year is expected to hit $207,000. Money left on the table.

Read More

Home sales rise for first time in 5 months

Sales of previously owned homes climbed in December for the first time in five months, capping the best year since 2006 and indicating the real estate market is starting to adjust to higher borrowing costs.

Purchases rose 1 percent to a 4.87 million annual pace, the National Association of Realtors reported on Thursday in Washington, D.C. Other reports showed claims for jobless benefits held last week near the lowest level in more than a month and the index of leading indicators climbed in December.

Read More

© Rebecca Lane 2014-2015
Cell 209-324-5411 • Fax 209-844-7824 •

'An impeccable reputation in real estate and a passion for dogs'